Match 8844752435
Average rank Immortal · 10 of 10 players show a rank
Performance
Pick a player to compare their game with everyone else on the same hero.
Momentum
Final: Radiant +20k
| Minute | Radiant gold advantage |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 1 | -350 |
| 2 | -194 |
| 3 | 98 |
| 4 | -154 |
| 5 | 1,079 |
| 6 | 772 |
| 7 | 1,424 |
| 8 | 1,575 |
| 9 | 1,722 |
| 10 | 2,158 |
| 11 | 2,633 |
| 12 | 2,531 |
| 13 | 4,132 |
| 14 | 5,157 |
| 15 | 6,227 |
| 16 | 5,100 |
| 17 | 5,140 |
| 18 | 5,276 |
| 19 | 6,184 |
| 20 | 7,086 |
| 21 | 8,704 |
| 22 | 5,803 |
| 23 | 6,922 |
| 24 | 7,337 |
| 25 | 7,351 |
| 26 | 7,553 |
| 27 | 7,988 |
| 28 | 7,904 |
| 29 | 8,360 |
| 30 | 12,200 |
| 31 | 17,106 |
| 32 | 20,227 |
Data from OpenDota, fetched . Players marked P1, P2… queued together as a party. Players who keep their profile anonymous stay anonymous here.
Replay
Pick a player under “How did they play?” to see their laning and items.
| Player | K / D / A | LH / DN | GPM / XPM | Net worth | Hero dmg | Tower dmg | Healing | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
李火旺P1 | 3 / 3 / 10 | 353 / 8 | 671 / 740 | 21.4k | 13.4k | 25.0k | 0 | |
无限P1 | 9 / 1 / 15 | 238 / 3 | 619 / 759 | 19.0k | 22.3k | 1,557 | 640 | |
3P1 | 7 / 4 / 9 | 253 / 3 | 584 / 712 | 18.6k | 13.3k | 1,340 | 38 | |
广东省最终兵器P1 | 7 / 2 / 15 | 48 / 2 | 392 / 620 | 13.3k | 14.1k | 939 | 329 | |
ahchinP1 | 4 / 4 / 21 | 94 / 5 | 430 / 577 | 12.6k | 19.1k | 324 | 5,066 |
| Player | K / D / A | LH / DN | GPM / XPM | Net worth | Hero dmg | Tower dmg | Healing | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ImpulseP2 | 3 / 4 / 4 | 301 / 6 | 572 / 661 | 18.0k | 14.7k | 1,449 | 0 | |
| 2 / 2 / 6 | 284 / 8 | 485 / 658 | 15.2k | 15.7k | 530 | 0 | ||
杭州吴彦祖P2 | 6 / 10 / 1 | 249 / 4 | 512 / 564 | 14.9k | 8,338 | 283 | 125 | |
绵羊P2 | 2 / 7 / 9 | 44 / 2 | 260 / 320 | 6,696 | 11.6k | 0 | 163 | |
谢乐zzz张泽中P2 | 0 / 8 / 6 | 13 / 2 | 218 / 288 | 5,523 | 3,388 | 0 | 1,706 |
The draft favours Radiant (53%). Radiant won, as the draft suggested.
Radiant: C 53/100
Dire: C 54/100
Estimated from the draft alone, with the same data and report card as the draft trainer. It picked the winner 57% of the time on recent high-rank games it hadn't seen, so treat it as a read, not a prediction.