Match 9048354916
![]()
Average rank Divine 5 · 10 of 10 players show a rank
Performance
Pick a player to compare their game with everyone else on the same hero.
Momentum
Final: Radiant +20k
| Minute | Radiant gold advantage |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 355 |
| 2 | 544 |
| 3 | 1,051 |
| 4 | 2,100 |
| 5 | 1,629 |
| 6 | 1,694 |
| 7 | 2,307 |
| 8 | 2,542 |
| 9 | 2,977 |
| 10 | 3,118 |
| 11 | 3,448 |
| 12 | 2,587 |
| 13 | 2,011 |
| 14 | 2,946 |
| 15 | 3,559 |
| 16 | 3,278 |
| 17 | 6,003 |
| 18 | 6,186 |
| 19 | 6,436 |
| 20 | 6,836 |
| 21 | 7,285 |
| 22 | 7,567 |
| 23 | 8,840 |
| 24 | 8,735 |
| 25 | 9,398 |
| 26 | 9,941 |
| 27 | 15,163 |
| 28 | 15,503 |
| 29 | 14,448 |
| 30 | 15,587 |
| 31 | 16,020 |
| 32 | 18,931 |
| 33 | 20,232 |
Data from OpenDota, fetched . Players marked P1, P2… queued together as a party. Players who keep their profile anonymous stay anonymous here.
Replay
Pick a player under “How did they play?” to see their laning and items.
| Player | K / D / A | LH / DN | GPM / XPM | Net worth | Hero dmg | Tower dmg | Healing | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 / 3 / 18 | 213 / 21 | 542 / 746 | 16.6k | 20.4k | 1,508 | 0 | ||
| 10 / 3 / 12 | 73 / 1 | 428 / 621 | 12.6k | 11.0k | 1,624 | 682 | ||
ArnoldP1 | 13 / 1 / 5 | 400 / 8 | 849 / 1027 | 28.0k | 18.0k | 24.9k | 0 | |
9P1 | 2 / 6 / 13 | 38 / 4 | 290 / 466 | 8,222 | 10.3k | 860 | 0 | |
| 7 / 7 / 10 | 185 / 4 | 543 / 654 | 16.1k | 12.1k | 1,512 | 220 |
| Player | K / D / A | LH / DN | GPM / XPM | Net worth | Hero dmg | Tower dmg | Healing | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 / 6 / 11 | 70 / 2 | 332 / 529 | 9,539 | 9,199 | 0 | 0 | ||
кавоssP2 | 1 / 8 / 15 | 11 / 3 | 236 / 394 | 7,146 | 11.6k | 88 | 0 | |
QuitesP2 | 2 / 8 / 7 | 268 / 0 | 466 / 463 | 14.3k | 16.7k | 428 | 0 | |
| 1 / 10 / 9 | 271 / 4 | 423 / 553 | 12.6k | 14.0k | 60 | 0 | ||
| 12 / 6 / 5 | 205 / 3 | 558 / 762 | 17.1k | 28.0k | 0 | 0 |
The draft favours Radiant (55%). Radiant won, as the draft suggested.
Radiant: B 64/100
Dire: D 49/100
Estimated from the draft alone, with the same data and report card as the draft trainer. It picked the winner 57% of the time on recent high-rank games it hadn't seen, so treat it as a read, not a prediction.