Match 8483754880
![]()
Average rank Divine 4 · 8 of 10 players show a rank
This match hasn't been replay-parsed by OpenDota yet, so the advantage graph and some stats (damage, healing, net worth) aren't available. Basic scoreboard data is shown.
Performance
Against recent games on Pudge, from OpenDota.
Strongest: gold per minute, better than 81% of Pudge games. Room to improve: hero damage per minute, better than 39%.
The line marks the middle: half of Pudge games do better, half worse. Per-minute stats depend on role and game length, so compare like with like.
Replay
OpenDota hasn't parsed this replay yet, so last hits at 10 minutes, item timings and wards aren't available. Ask it to: it's free and usually takes a few minutes.
| Player | K / D / A | LH / DN | GPM / XPM | Net worth | Hero dmg | Tower dmg | Healing | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 / 9 / 9 | 473 / 4 | 692 / 970 | 28.5k | 24.0k | 11.8k | 0 | ||
| 16 / 6 / 11 | 386 / 17 | 718 / 1107 | 30.5k | 37.5k | 12.3k | 0 | ||
Anonymous Unranked · Venomancer · Shard | 5 / 10 / 23 | 229 / 1 | 467 / 702 | 19.8k | 20.2k | 458 | 7,071 | |
| 10 / 13 / 23 | 208 / 16 | 486 / 638 | 19.6k | 21.7k | 1,409 | 0 | ||
| 4 / 11 / 28 | 69 / 2 | 360 / 658 | 13.6k | 12.6k | 5,955 | 125 |
| Player | K / D / A | LH / DN | GPM / XPM | Net worth | Hero dmg | Tower dmg | Healing | Items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 / 6 / 13 | 592 / 6 | 918 / 1164 | 38.8k | 77.1k | 12.4k | 0 | ||
Anonymous Unranked · Earthshaker · Shard | 7 / 14 / 22 | 336 / 10 | 613 / 827 | 24.2k | 31.0k | 632 | 0 | |
| 7 / 11 / 27 | 136 / 3 | 463 / 766 | 17.6k | 35.3k | 745 | 0 | ||
| 6 / 9 / 28 | 233 / 7 | 527 / 756 | 21.3k | 21.7k | 967 | 243 | ||
| 4 / 7 / 12 | 73 / 0 | 248 / 264 | 102 | 10.1k | 332 | 0 |
Data from OpenDota, fetched . Players marked P1, P2… queued together as a party. Players who keep their profile anonymous stay anonymous here.
The draft favours Radiant (52%). Radiant won, as the draft suggested.
Radiant: B 66/100
Dire: C 55/100
Estimated from the draft alone, with the same data and report card as the draft trainer. It picked the winner 57% of the time on recent high-rank games it hadn't seen, so treat it as a read, not a prediction.